still makes me mad

kaosinla · Post by **kaosinla** » Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:47 pm

I've seen this many times.....What do you think?

Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.

Our Senators and Congresswomen do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it.

You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan.

In more recent years, no congress person has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.

For all practical purposes their plan works like this:

When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die.

Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments.

For example, former Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives.

This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.

Younger Dignitaries who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives.

Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. NADA....ZILCH....

This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;

"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"!

From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, -every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer)- we can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month after retirement.

Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!

Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.

That change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us . then sit back and watch how fast they would fix it.

Vagrant · Post by **Vagrant** » Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:12 pm

I refuse to "go ballistic" on the weekend

If any company tried to offer a investment plan identical to Social Security, the Securiteis and Exchange Commision would shut them down and put the executives in Federal Prison. Pyramid plans like SS are highly illegal since they can NOT work, on a long term basis.

The Falcon · Post by **The Falcon** » Sun Mar 14, 2004 9:10 am

We should start a "Government Rant Thread".
It's bound to be longer than the "IHT".

Vagrant · Post by **Vagrant** » Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:02 pm

The Falcon wrote:We should start a "Government Rant Thread".
It's bound to be longer than the "IHT".

If we listed ways to correct, change, or fix things, most of the solutions would be felonies

Post by **tequiza** » Sun Mar 14, 2004 7:24 pm

vagrant wrote:If we listed ways to correct, change, or fix things, most of the solutions would be felonies

nah,plea bargain

teq

JAGMAN · Post by **JAGMAN** » Mon Mar 15, 2004 2:46 am

Just figured out your handle Kaos - good one,
when you said-
"You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan. "

I guess the politicians are not big on the HMO's either?
Jagman